Blogposts

• Should we increase greenspace to improve living environments in Dutch prisons?
• The Big Bang in EU Law, Promises and Empirical Reality
• Chile’s Constituent Process: The End of Pinochet’s Neoliberal Legality?
• Judiciaries Must Build Support in Societies
• Following the Constitution in Times of Corona: A Path to Redeeming Constitutional Idolatry in The Netherlands?
• Algorithmic discrimination in Europe: Challenges and Opportunities for EU equality law
• Death by ransomware
• National security and the processing of personal data
• Three lessons on the relationship between EU and national law in the context of the duty of consistent interpretation
• Biopolitics and the Coronavirus: in Defence of Giorgio Agamben
• The International Criminal Court at 18 years: Things to Watch in 2020
• NGOs, National Human Rights Institutions: Crucial intermediaries in the execution of ECtHR judgments?
• An Ethics of Just Judgment for Transnational Challenges
• Being Realistic About Law
• Truth Commissions and Social Justice: Modesty is in Order
• Transformative Reparations for Victims under International Law: Changing the Game or More of the Same?
• Milieudefensie summons Shell: Similar obligations for States and companies when it comes to CO2 reduction?
• Collection of bodies in Mosul: An act of revenge, humanity – or both?
• Artificial intelligence in courts: A (legal) introduction to the Robot Judge
• The Two-Way Street Between Law and Social Psychology
• Egenberger and Bauer: The EU Charter as a source of rights and obligations for individuals
• Protecting the rule of law by European Courts – which way to go?
• Independence and autonomy: the parallel worlds of courts and public agencies
• Using Guarantees of Non-Repetition to (Re)Frame Police Reforms
• The mysterious appeal of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
• Process-based fundamental rights review: what about the applicant?
• The Rome Statute at 20 Years: Exploring Intersections of Law and Culture at the International Criminal Court
• “Practically unimportant”? A poor excuse or well-executed sarcasm? — On China’s constitutional amendment removing the limitation on the President’s term of office
• Drifting between disciplines: the challenges of doing multi- and interdisciplinary research
• ‘Every Organ of Society’: Exploring the Role of Social Institutions in the Effective Implementation of International Human Rights Law
• Constitutional Amendments to China’s Presidency and Supervisory Commissions
• Politicians, sore losers?
• #Whataboutthepresumptionofinnocence?
• Fake Facts: the Justice Scoreboard of the Directorate General for Justice and Consumer protection
• The Proof is in the Pudding: The Value of Traditional Justice Mechanisms for Post Conflict Africa
• Why is a legal “case” literally called a “desk” in Chinese?
• Game changer: how newspapers can stimulate legal unity in Europe
• Religion is a building block not a stumbling block for the integration of Muslims
• Disdain for Law and Democracy: A Red Flag in Radicalization Processes
• Montaigne Researchers Present at the Annual Asian Law Institute Conference in Manila, Philippines May 2017
• Procedural review: a solution for the European Court of Human Right’s problems?
• Emerging Role of Expert Opinions in Chinese Criminal Justice
• Local Resident Committee: Promoting access to justice for migrant women domestic helpers in China
• The Rainy Season in Java: Researching the Role of Islamic Law and Institutions in Promoting Women’s Right to Family Planning in Indonesia
• International Studies Association Conference in Trump Country: Discussing civil society documentation of serious human rights abuses
• Unity of law in the application of the duty of consistent interpretation?
• The Urgenda judgement: legislature and government under intensive judicial supervision
• Should the national day be considered as the birthday of the mother country? The conflict between two kinds of outlooks on the concept of “country”
• Duality or Complementarity？The Political and Legal Orientations of the Chinese Petitioning Mandate
• Honest judges, trustworthy judges